Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Why are horses traditionally mounted from the left side?

Traditionally, people mount a horse from the left side (although today, we train them to accept someone getting on them from both sides). I was always told that this was because knights used to wear their swords on their right leg, which they then had to keep straight when mounting. Thus, they bent their left leg into the stirrup and were able to swing their right leg over straight. However, recently I have noticed that whenever I see knights depicted in paintings or movies, the sword is typically on the left side. Can you help me figure this one out? What is the straight dope on why people traditionally mount horses on the left side?

— Heather Hipp, Atlanta, GA

We'd better begin by acknowledging the obvious, Heather. The fact is that most people don't mount a horse from the left side. Most people call a cab. Those having some acquaintance with horsemanship, however, know that the left side is the horse's "near" side while the right side is the "off" side. This is often explained in terms of swords, but we're then obliged to acknowledge obvious fact #2: While a fair number of people still ride horses, you're living in one tough neighborhood if you need to do so while wearing a sword.

About those swords. I'm afraid you've gotten the explanation a little scrambled. As you've observed, swords are traditionally worn on the left, since that makes it easier for a right-handed swordsman to pull the sword from its scabbard. If you're wearing a sword on the left, you'll want to mount your horse on its left, since otherwise the sword will get in the way. The practice goes way back before the medieval heyday of knights. In fact, it most likely originated when sword-toting warriors first began riding horses into battle.

The ancient Greek general Xenophon (c.430-c.355 B.C.), in his treatise The Art of Horsemanship, gives a step-by-step description--literally--of mounting a horse. Since the stirrup hadn't been invented yet (and wouldn't be until around 400 A.D.), this involved grasping the horse's mane in two places--up by the ears with the left hand and at the base of the neck with the right. The rider would then jump up while swinging his right leg over the horse's back (horses tended to be shorter in ancient times). Alternatively, if he was carrying a spear, the rider could use it to vault onto his charger. Xenophon advocates learning to mount from the right or "off" side in case the exigencies of war required it. It's plain from his detailed description that the left or "near" side of the horse was the correct side for mounting in Xenophon's time, when horses were primarily used for war.

Even when the stirrup came into use, the sheathed sword would still be in the way in mounting from the right, and would be likely to jab the horse in the side or rump just as the rider was swinging his leg over its back. The startled horse would then be strongly inclined to bolt, leaving the rider (briefly) in midair.

So why do we still mount from the left? After all, except for the occasional ceremony, the cavalry has ridden off into the sunset. To answer the question, we need to delve into equine physiology and psychology.

Let's start with a fundamental fact, essential to understanding equines: The horse isn't a predator--it's prey. Even after millennia of domestication, the horse is physically and mentally hardwired to detect and elude attackers. Its eyes are set on the sides of its head, giving it almost 360 degrees of vision. It sees two monocular fields at once, one through each eye. The binocular vision we human predators take for granted, the horse has in only a small area directly ahead of it. So what it "knows" on one side, it doesn't "know" on the other, until it's been shown. The horse's instincts dispose it to be suspicious of anything new in its environment. The thing behind that rock that wasn't there yesterday could be a lion!

What does this have to do with mounting from the left? It means that a horse who's been taught to accept being mounted only from one side may be perfectly docile when the rider clambers aboard on that side, yet spook and refuse to stand still if approached from the unfamiliar direction. That's why authorities on horse training (including our old friend Xenophon) recommend teaching horses to be mounted from the off side, so that they'll stand still for it if circumstances demand that the rider get on from that side

But why prefer the left side when swords are no longer a problem? Partly it's the inertia of tradition--horses and humans are both creatures of habit. But it's also common sense to have a standard approach. If you didn't know which side a particular horse had learned to be mounted from, you could get a nasty surprise if you tried to get on from the "wrong" side.


The Art of Horsemanship, Xenophon (translated by Morris H. Morgan, Ph.D.), first published 1894, repub. 1993 by J. A. Allen & Co. Ltd., London.

The Horseman's Encyclopedia, Margaret Cabell Self, 1963, A. S. Barnes & Co. Inc., New York.

The Body Language of Horses, Thomas Ainslie and Bonnie Ledbetter, 1980, Wm. Morrow & Co. Inc., New York.

Encyclopedia of the Horse, ed. by Elwyn Hartley Edwards, 1987, Crescent Books, New York.

Horse Facts, Susan McBane and Helen Douglas-Cooper, 1990, Dorset Press, New York.

— EddyTeddyFreddy


Anonymous said...

Greetings from Iԁaho! Ι'm bored to tears at work so I decided to browse your site on my iphone during lunch break. I really like the information you provide here and can't
wаit tο tаke а look ωhen
Ӏ get home. I'm amazed at how quick your blog loaded on my cell phone .. I'm not eνen uѕing WIFI,
just 3G .. Anyhοw, ѵery gοod blοg!

my blog post; Simi Valley water damage restoration
My page water damage cleanup

Anonymous said...

Hеllο Thеrе. I found yοur blog
uѕing msn. Thiѕ is an extгemеlу wеll written artіcle.

I will maκе ѕure to bookmaгk
it and return to rеad morе of уοur useful infо.
Thanks fοr the poѕt. I'll certainly comeback.

my site ... Savannah water damage
Also see my web site ::

Anonymous said...

Нi everуbody, heгe every pеrѕon is sharing these kinds
οf experienсе, thus it's fastidious to read this website, and I used to pay a quick visit this blog daily.

Look at my blog ::
Also visit my web blog - water damage cleanup

Anonymous said...

Gοoԁ day! I know this is kindа off topic hoωever ,
Ι'd figured I'd ask. Would уou be іntегestеd in trаding links оr maуbe
guest authoгing а blog post or vice-veгsа?
My sitе goеs oveг a lot of the
same subjects aѕ yours and I thinκ
we could greаtly benefit from еach other. Ӏf you're interested feel free to send me an e-mail. I look forward to hearing from you! Awesome blog by the way!

Also visit my blog
Also see my web page: water damage restoration

Anonymous said...

Hello there! Τhіs blog рost cοuldn't be written any better! Going through this post reminds me of my previous roommate! He constantly kept preaching about this. I most certainly will send this article to him. Fairly certain he's
goіng to hаve а vегу gooԁ read.
I apρreсiate you fοr shаring!

Fееl fгee to surf tо my blοg .

.. home water damage
My weblog - water damage cleanup

Anonymous said...

Cаn I simply јust sаy what a reliеf to finԁ someοnе who tгuly unԁerѕtаndѕ whаt they
aгe talκing about on the web. Үou certainly геalize how tο bгing an
issue to light anԁ maκe іt іmpoгtant.

Μore and morе реoρle muѕt check thiѕ out and undeгstand this
sіdе of the stοгу.
It's surprising you are not more popular because you definitely have the gift.

Feel free to surf to my homepage ... water damage providence
my web site - water extraction